Doctors who perform abortions could face up to five years in prison. The bill passed the State Senate 23-12. It's expected to pass the House again and then go to Governor Mike Rounds' desk. The bill's sponsor says he thinks the antiabortion movement has momentum on its side and a—quote—“change in national policy on abortion is going to come in the not-too-distant future.”
To read an excerpt from their conversation, click on this link
In his opening statement DAN ABRAMS, HOST, ‘ABRAMS REPORT' states:
"My Take” is that the state lawmakers have got to know this bill effectively spits in the face of the U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Not just because of Roe v. Wade, because the high court reaffirmed Roe when it revisited the abortion issue in 1992 in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. A majority agreed that women have the right to have an abortion before the fetus is viable and to obtain an abortion without undue interference from the state.
So whatever you think of abortion, this law is almost an insult to the court. Governor, I know you've made it perfectly clear you support many abortion restrictions, but this is not an abortion restriction. This is outlawing it. I assume you've got to know that this wouldn't pass the court's test.
Dan has it right, I may be a Canadian liberal, small l. But attacking a womens right to not have to live with the stigmatisms that the world would impose on her if she was forced into bringing a child into the world that was the result of a rape or god forbid incest, is as sick as the act it self.
Roe v Wade is a world wide cornerstone of justice and for a handful of South Dakota extremist politicians to even conceive such a bill proves that their is something seriously wrong with our elected officials.
Here in this country our Canadian women found themselves in a similar fight for respect.
On May 29, 1990, the House of Commons passed Bill C-43. This bill would have put abortion back into the Criminal Code, while exempting from penalty those abortions deemed necessary by a physician for health reasons. Bill C-43 was awaiting only Senate approval to become Canada’s new abortion law when, suddenly, two cases of clandestine illegal abortion reappeared in Canada. In June of 1990, a sixteen-year-old girl from Kitchener, Ontario, sustained physical injury from a botched abortion performed in a man’s home. Less than two weeks later, a Toronto woman died from a self-induced coat-hanger abortion, apparently the first such death in well over a decade.
When Bill C-43 was introduced, at least sixty doctors, fearful of possible criminal prosecution, stopped performing abortions. A 1990 survey done by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada found that 275 of the 460 specialists then performing abortions would stop if the bill became law. The legal possibility of criminal charges for performing an abortion was simply a greater price than most doctors could afford to pay.
Bill C-43 was defeated by the Senate on January 31, 1991, in a dramatic tie vote. Since then, there have been no new attempts by the federal government to return abortion to the Criminal Code. Abortion in Canada has remained a private medical matter between a woman and her doctor since 1988.
Later,
Kenaz