An opening of one's knowledge,capabilities, vision and guidance. The Kenaz is about creating a relationship,learning and allowing room for interpretation. When you are in the darkness,an opening with light is the best and most gracious thing to have bestowed upon you. This is a great time for putting energies into new opportunities. Come share my world as I see it.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

The province and Hamilton police shut down crack house

The Ontario Attorney General has seized an infamous downtown Hamilton landmark, scene of every type of crime from drug dealing to murder. The seizure yesterday is the first step to freeze and forfeit to the Crown the property at 193 King St. E., which includes the defunct Sandbar tavern and five apartments above it.

Chief Brian Mullan says the police department plans to use the Civil Remedies Act as a weapon to move against trouble spots across the city. Police now have an officer specializing in applications of the legislation. He promised to use it against booze cans selling illegal alcohol, marijuana grow operations and prostitution.

Mullan said this is the first time the conspiracy section of the Remedies for Organized Crime and Other Unlawful Activities Act (Civil Remedies Act) has been applied in a seizure.

Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant came to Hamilton yesterday to stand in front of the old Sandbar and promise a safe community.

"This crack house of horrors is out of business."


Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant, right, with police Chief Brian Mullan, centre, and Hamilton Police Services Board Chair Bernie Morelli, announces the seizure of the tavern.



The property manager of the King Street East building was not available for comment yesterday. The building's owner, Ruth Ricca, was quoted after a homicide in the building in 2003 that she had nothing to do with how the building was run. She was not available for comment.

The Sandbar closed in 1999 when the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario revoked its licence, charging that drugs were sold, stolen property was fenced and violence was common. There have been two murders in the apartments upstairs since. In 2001, Jackie McLean, 35, was beaten to death in an unoccupied apartment. Two years later Jim McAllister was stabbed to death there.

The province and police are invoking rarely used powers to implement the five-year old Civil Remedies Act. Under this legislation, the court can take over private property suspected of housing criminal activity.

Mullan -- whose own office window faces the backside of a building he calls "a blight" across a parking lot -- says police have answered calls to the site almost every day for years and have spent millions of dollars in policing this one address. In the past 10 years, two crack-cocaine related murders, numerous stabbings and illegal drug trafficking have all taken place inside.

Three weeks ago, police armed with search warrants for each of the five apartments arrested a number of people on charges involving crack cocaine and seized closed circuit video equipment which had been used to monitor the entrance and the stairs leading to the apartments.

Police now have to show the extent of criminal activity within and that means boxes and boxes of incident reports had to be submitted. A hearing will be held in about a month to determine whether the seizure will be made permanent. At that hearing police will have to demonstrate that "criminal enterprise was being undertaken at the location with the knowledge of the landlord."

Mullan said the ministry was prepared to move ahead some months ago but decided to hold off until the trial of McLean's killer finished a few weeks ago. If the final hearing is successful, use of the conspiracy section of the legislation will become "a benchmark case that will be precedent-setting and will allow other police services to take advantage of the legislation in this way, in partnership with the ministry."

Area residents breathed a sigh of relief as they watched lock smiths and city workers board up the den of hell. A police officer will guard the boarded up building 24 hours a day until the courts allow the province to sell it.

Since being created five years ago, the Civil Remedies Act has been used to seize half a dozen properties in Hamilton and more than 100 in Ontario. The province has accumulated more than $2.2 million from the sale of these properties.

Civil asset forfeiture, as used in the Sandbar case, focuses solely on the connection between property and unlawful activity whereas criminal asset forfeiture permits forfeiture of assets obtained by or used in the commission of an offence following conviction of an individual.

Later,
Kenaz

$28,700 cup brew-ha-ha!

Luck struck two St. Jerome, Quebec (near Montreal) girls when they discovered a winning Tim Hortons coffee cup yesterday, but now their families are fighting over who gets the prize. The dispute began after a 10-year-old girl named Marilou found the cup in the garbage bin of her primary school. Remembering the doughnut chain's popular contest, she tried to roll up the rim. Her small fingers were unable to loosen the tough cardboard, so she enlisted the help of a 12-year-old schoolmate. The other girl rolled up the rim and found it was a winner, entitlement to a Toyota RAV4 SUV - base price $28,700 - one of 30 automobiles being given away as prizes.

"They took the cup to the school's daycare service, and a teacher called both parents," said Nathalie Prevost, mother of the 12-year-old girl. Prevost would not reveal her daughter's name.

"The first parent to arrive there was Marilou's father, so he took the cup."

Prevost thought her daughter's helping hand deserved some recognition, however, so she phoned a local radio station to ask for legal advice.

"I wanted the name of a lawyer who could tell me if my daughter is entitled some of the prize," Prevost said.

That's when the story became a media sensation.

Marilou's father, who remained anonymous, said in a televised broadcast he wanted to give some money from the sale of the car to Prevost's family.

"But this morning they said (on the radio) they wanted everything, so now they'll lose it all because they went too far," he said.

Prevost countered she's not seeking a specific amount.

"It's not for me, it's for my daughter's education," she said.

"I never wanted this to blow up the way it has."

Tim Hortons spokesperson Greg Skinner could not confirm the cup was a winner, because the prize had not been claimed.

But he said the winner of the prize is whoever submits the cup's tab.

"If I buy you a coffee and you get a winning cup, it's your car," Skinner said. "I might be mad at you as your best friend, but you're the winner."


Because the girls are minors, he noted, neither of them can claim the RAV4 as a prize. Prevost said she doesn't plan to go to court but hopes the other family will find it in their hearts to recognize her daughter's part in their luck.

"At least I hope the parents save the money for their daughter's education and don't spend it themselves," she said.

As for the girls, they had a bit of a spat at school, but their teachers got them on speaking terms again, Prevost said.

"They weren't very close friends to begin with," she said.

(yeesh! people it's not macro-science, sell the goddam SUV and split the proceeds 50/50. The only problem I've ever had is feeling ripped off when the free tea biscuit I won was much smaller than the regular ones.)

Update: the situation could get more complicated.

CBC-TV's The National reported last night that a staff member who may have thrown the cup away is said to be considering legal action.

But it would a tough battle.

"The person who threw out that coffee cup, they gave up on it. It's gone, you cannot find who it was," a lawyer said.

Later,
Kenaz